Multidimensional chromatography method for analysis of antibody-drug conjugates

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure relates to a sensitive, multidimensional chromatography method for extraction, detection, and quantification of non-conjugated cytotoxic agents and associated linker molecules used in cysteine based antibody-drug-conjugate production.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a National Stage Application of InternationalApplication No. PCT/US2016/050628, filed Sep. 8, 2016, which claimspriority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/215,339, filed Sep. 8,2015. Each of the foregoing applications is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to a sensitive, multidimensionalchromatography method for extraction, detection, and quantification ofnon-conjugated cytotoxic agents and associated linker molecules used incysteine based antibody-drug-conjugate production.

BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) compounds represent a growing class ofimmunoconjugate therapies. ADC compounds are complex molecules composedof a monoclonal antibody connected to a biologically active, highlycytotoxic drug via a cleavable (e.g., acid labile linkers, proteasecleavable linkers, and disulfide linkers) or a non-cleavable linker. Theconjugation of potent drugs to a monoclonal antibody enables thetargeted delivery of toxic payloads to tumor surfaces while minimizingsystemic toxicity effects to healthy tissue, thus improving thetherapeutic window for such modalities in the treatment of cancer.

Incomplete conjugation processes can result in free or non-conjugateddrug, drug-linker, or drug related impurities. Additionally, degradationproducts can occur over time in formulation as well as in vivo,increasing the risk to patients and reducing the efficacy of the ADCcompound. Trace levels of these free drug species may be present informulated ADC compounds despite purification steps implemented duringthe production process. For these reasons, characterization of residualfree drug and associated products is required to ensure a safe andefficacious product.

Current methods for the detection of trace free drug species areultimately encumbered by several drawbacks, including low specificityand/or sensitivity in the detection, characterization, andquantification of trace free drug species in unadulterated ADC compoundsamples. Accordingly there remains a need in the art for new detectionmethods that enable straightforward integration into existing or novelworkflows.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to new and useful multidimensionalchromatography methodologies for detecting and/or quantifying one ormore non-conjugated drugs (e.g., cytotoxic and anticancer compounds) andassociated linker molecules used in the production of cysteine-basedantibody-drug conjugate compounds.

Accordingly, provided herein is a method for analyzing antibody-drugconjugate compounds in samples comprising an antibody-drug conjugatecompound and an unconjugated drug compound. The method includes thesteps of exposing the sample to a first dimension comprising a mixedmode stationary phase and exposing the sample to a second dimensioncomprising hydrophobic stationary phase. The method provides forseparation of the antibody-drug conjugate compound and the unconjugateddrug compound in the sample.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of trappingthe unconjugated drug compound. In one embodiment, the trapping step isperformed prior to the step of exposing the sample to the firstdimension. Alternatively, the trapping step is performed between thestep of exposing the sample the first dimension and the step of exposingthe sample to the second dimension.

Also provided herein is a method analyzing antibody-drug conjugatecompounds in samples comprising an antibody-drug conjugate compound, anunconjugated drug compound, and an associated linker molecule. In someembodiments, the unconjugated drug compound is the free drug. In otherembodiments, the unconjugated drug compound is linked to a reactive formof the associated linker molecule. In still other embodiments, theunconjugated drug compound is linked to a quenched or deactivated formof the linker molecule. The sample is first exposed to a first dimensionseparation, then the sample is exposed to a second dimension separation.The method involves the step of trapping a portion of the unconjugateddrug compound and/or the associated linker molecule with a stationaryphase either prior to the first dimension separation or between thefirst dimension separation and the second dimension separation.

The methods provided herein detect each of the antibody-drug conjugatecompound, the unconjugated drug compound, and, optionally, theassociated linker molecule in the samples of the methods. In someembodiments, mass spectrometry is used to detect each of theantibody-drug conjugate compound, the unconjugated drug compound, and,optionally, the associated linker molecule in the samples of the method.In particular embodiments, the methods provided herein use massspectrometry to establish a mass to charge ratio of each of theantibody-drug conjugate compound, the unconjugated drug compound, and,optionally, the associated linker molecule in the samples of themethods. In other embodiments, ultraviolet and/or visible spectroscopyis used to detect each of the antibody-drug conjugate compound, theunconjugated drug compound, and, optionally, the associated linkermolecule in the samples of the method. In still other embodiments,fluorescence spectroscopy is used to detect each of the antibody-drugconjugate compound, the unconjugated drug compound, and, optionally, theassociated linker molecule in the samples of the method.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows one exemplary embodiment of the method of the invention.

FIG. 2 shows one exemplary embodiment of the method of the invention.

FIG. 3 shows one exemplary embodiment of the method of the invention.

FIGS. 4A-C depict antibody-fluorophore-conjugate (AFC) mimic components.Drug components used in the production of a non-toxic AFC to mimicchemistry and linker species of brentuximab vedotin were based on a A)dansyl sulfonamide ethyl amine (DSEA) moiety attached to B) amaleimidocaproyl valine-citrulline linker species (Mal-linker-DSEA).Residual reactive mal-linker-DSEA was quenched with N-acetyl-cysteinefollowing the conjugation step, producing a C)quenched-linker-fluorophore (NAc-linker-DSEA) adduct species.

FIG. 5 shows the reference standard evaluation using a mixture of thethree reference standards, which were base line resolved within theapplied gradient (500). DSEA (510), NAc-linker-DSEA (520), andMal-linker-DSEA (530) reference standards were separated over a 10 mingradient from 5%-50% (dashed line) with acetonitrile, 0.1% FA v/v, asthe organic mobile phase using a superficially porous C18 RPLC column.540 represents the conditioning peak. Combined spectrum from SIRscollected using the [M+H]⁺¹ and [M+2H]⁺² charge state for each componentusing optimized MS settings (see “Materials and Methods,” found in theExemplification) is shown.

FIG. 6 shows the assay dynamic range. Analysis of reference standardswere performed in triplicate. Calibration plots of the referencestandards were generated using peak area from SIRs for the most abundant[M+2H]⁺² charge state and fitted with an ordinary linear regressionmodel. Using ICH guidelines the MS quadrupole dynamic range wasdetermined to be 1.35 pg-688.5 pg for the mal-linker-DSEA and 1.65pg-854.5 pg for the NAc-Linker-DSEA reference standards.

FIGS. 7A-C depict the instrument configuration schematic. A columnmanager housing two 6-port 2-position valves was configured asillustrated by the schematic to facilitate transfer of retained drugspecies between the SPE (1^(st)) (730) and RPLC (2^(nd)) (760)dimensions. Valve position is denoted numerically as position 700 and705. The other components of the instrument include: QSM: quaternarysolvent manager (710), AS: auto sampler (720), ACD: at-column dilution(740); TUV: tunable ultraviolet detector (770), BSM: binary solventmanager (750), MS: mass spectrometer (780).

FIG. 8 depicts the method evaluation of SPE with spiked sample. DSEA,mal-linker-DSEA, and NAc-linker-DSEA was spiked into a neat AFC samplefor SPE optimization. Optimal SPE loading conditions for the extractionof mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEA components from the spiked AFCsample were determined to be 18% acetonitrile, 2% FA. A step gradient to36% acetonitrile, 2% FA was determined to be optimal conditions to elutebound drug components in a narrow peak centered around 13.5 min.

FIGS. 9A-B depict the evaluation of 2DLC configuration. NAc-linker-DSEA,spiked into an AFC sample, was successfully transferred from A) SPE(1^(st) dimension) to the B) RPLC (2^(nd) dimension) using the 2DLCconfiguration illustrated in FIGS. 4A-B as proof-of-principle.

FIGS. 10A-B depict the DSEA sample. A) using the optimized 2DLC methodas shown in FIG. 7, a water blank was performed prior to each DSEAsample injection to monitor carry-over between DSEA sample injections.Overlay chromatograms of the three water blanks indicate negligiblecarry over of mal-linker-DSEA and no observable carry over ofNAc-linker-DSEA between runs. B) mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEAdrug components were detected in a 10 μL injection (19.4 μg) of neat AFCsample. Overlays of the three runs indicate a high degree of assayreproducibility.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference will now be made in detail to certain embodiments of theinvention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanyingfigures. While the invention will be described in conjunction with theenumerated embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intendedto limit the invention to those embodiments. On the contrary, theinvention is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, andequivalents, which may be included within the scope of the presentinvention as defined by the claims. One skilled in the art willrecognize many methods and materials similar or equivalent to thosedescribed herein, which could be used in the practice of the presentinvention. The present invention is in no way limited to the methods andmaterials described.

Definitions

Unless stated otherwise, the following terms and phrases as used hereinare intended to have the following meanings:

As used herein “antibody drug conjugates: or “ADCs” are monoclonalantibodies (mAbs) attached to biologically active drugs by chemicallinkers with labile bonds.

“Antibody” is used herein in the broadest sense and specifically coversmonoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies(e.g., bispecific antibodies), and antibody fragments. Antibodies may bemurine, human, humanized, chimeric, or derived from other species. Anantibody is a protein generated by the immune system that is capable ofrecognizing and binding to a specific antigen. (Janeway, et al (2001)“Immunobiology”, 5th Ed., Garland Publishing, New York). A targetantigen generally has numerous binding sites, also called epitopes,recognized by CDRs on multiple antibodies. Each antibody thatspecifically binds to a different epitope has a different structure.Thus, one antigen may have more than one corresponding antibody.

Antibody also refers to a full-length immunoglobulin molecule or animmunologically active portion of a full-length immunoglobulin molecule,i.e., a molecule that contains an antigen binding site thatimmunospecifically binds an antigen of a target of interest or partthereof, such targets including but not limited to, cancer cell or cellsthat produce autoimmune antibodies associated with an autoimmunedisease. The immunoglobulin disclosed herein can be of any type (e.g.,IgG, IgE, IgM, IgD, and IgA), class (e.g., IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1and IgA2) or subclass of immunoglobulin molecule. The immunoglobulinscan be derived from any species. In one aspect, however, theimmunoglobulin is of human, murine, or rabbit origin.

The term “linker unit” refers to the direct or indirect linkage of theantibody to the drug. Attachment of a linker to a mAb can beaccomplished in a variety of ways, such as through surface lysines,reductive-coupling to oxidized carbohydrates, and through cysteineresidues liberated by reducing interchain disulfide linkages. A varietyof ADC linkage systems are known in the art, including hydrazone-,disulfide- and peptide-based linkages.

The term “active pharmaceutical ingredient” or “API” refers to is theingredient in a pharmaceutical drug that is biologically active. Theterms “pharmaceutical drug,” “drug,” and “payload” are usedinterchangeably throughout, and refer to any substance having biologicalor detectable activity, for example, therapeutic agents, detectablelabels, binding agents, etc., and prodrugs, which are metabolized to anactive agent in vivo.

As used herein, the term “mass spectrometry” or “MS” refers to ananalytical technique to identify compounds by their mass. MS refers tomethods of filtering, detecting, and measuring ions based on theirmass-to-charge ratio, or “m/z”. MS technology generally includes (1)ionizing the compounds to form charged compounds; and (2) detecting themolecular weight of the charged compounds and calculating amass-to-charge ratio. The compounds may be ionized and detected by anysuitable means. A “mass spectrometer” generally includes an ionizer andan ion detector. In general, one or more molecules of interest areionized, and the ions are subsequently introduced into a massspectrometric instrument where, due to a combination of magnetic andelectric fields, the ions follow a path in space that is dependent uponmass (“m”) and charge (“z”).

As used herein, the term “ionization” or “ionizing” refers to theprocess of generating an analyte ion having a net electrical chargeequal to one or more electron units. Negative ions are those having anet negative charge of one or more electron units, while positive ionsare those having a net positive charge of one or more electron units.

As used herein, the term “chromatography” refers to a process in which achemical mixture carried by a liquid or gas is separated into componentsas a result of differential distribution of the chemical entities asthey flow around or over a stationary liquid or solid phase.

As used herein, the term “liquid chromatography” or “LC” means a processof selective retardation of one or more components of a fluid solutionas the fluid uniformly percolates through a column of a finely dividedsubstance, or through capillary passageways. The retardation resultsfrom the distribution of the components of the mixture between one ormore stationary phases and the bulk fluid, (i.e., mobile phase), as thisfluid moves relative to the stationary phase(s). Examples of “liquidchromatography” include reverse phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ultra-high performance liquidchromatography (UHPLC), turbulent flow liquid chromatography (TFLC)(sometimes known as high turbulence liquid chromatography (HTLC) or highthroughput liquid chromatography).

As used herein, the term “high performance liquid chromatography” or“HPLC” (also sometimes known as “high pressure liquid chromatography”)refers to liquid chromatography in which the degree of separation isincreased by forcing the mobile phase under pressure through astationary phase, typically a densely packed column. As used herein, theterm “ultra high performance liquid chromatography” or “UHPLC”(sometimes known as “ultra high pressure liquid chromatography”) refersto HPLC that occurs at much higher pressures than traditional HPLCtechniques.

The term “LC/MS” refers to a liquid chromatograph (LC) interfaced to amass spectrometer.

Methods of the Invention

The present disclosure relates to new and useful multidimensionalchromatography methodologies for detecting and/or quantifying one ormore non-conjugated drugs (e.g., cytotoxic and anticancer compounds) andassociated linker molecules used in the production of cysteine-basedantibody-drug conjugate compounds.

Accordingly, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, provided herein are methods(100, 200) for analyzing antibody-drug conjugate compounds in samplescomprising an antibody-drug conjugate compound and an unconjugated drugcompound. The methods include the steps of exposing the sample to afirst dimension comprising a mixed mode stationary phase (120, 220) andexposing the sample to a second dimension comprising hydrophobicstationary phase (130, 230). The methods provide for separation (140,240) of the antibody-drug conjugate compound and the unconjugated drugcompound in the sample.

In some embodiments, some of the methods further comprise the step oftrapping the unconjugated drug compound. In one embodiment, the trappingstep is performed prior to the step of exposing the sample to the firstdimension. Alternatively, the trapping step is performed between thestep of exposing the sample the first dimension and the step of exposingthe sample to the second dimension.

As shown in FIG. 3, also provided herein is a method (300) analyzingantibody-drug conjugate compounds in samples comprising an antibody-drugconjugate compound, an unconjugated drug compound, and an associatedlinker molecule. In some embodiments, the unconjugated drug compound isthe free drug. In other embodiments, the unconjugated drug compound islinked to a reactive form of the associated linker molecule. In stillother embodiments, the unconjugated drug compound is linked to aquenched or deactivated form of the linker molecule. The sample is firstexposed to a first dimension separation (330), then the sample isexposed to a second dimension separation (350). The method involves thestep of trapping a portion of the unconjugated drug compound and/or theassociated linker molecule with a stationary phase either prior to thefirst dimension separation (320) or between the first dimensionseparation and the second dimension separation (340).

As shown in FIG. 1, the methods provided herein detect (150) each of theantibody-drug conjugate compound, the unconjugated drug compound, and,optionally, the associated linker molecule in the samples of themethods. In some embodiments, mass spectrometry is used to detect eachof the antibody-drug conjugate compound, the unconjugated drug compound,and, optionally, the associated linker molecule in the samples of themethod. As shown in FIG. 2, in particular embodiments, the methodsprovided herein use mass spectrometry to establish a mass to chargeratio (250) of each of the antibody-drug conjugate compound, theunconjugated drug compound, and, optionally, the associated linkermolecule in the samples of the methods. In other embodiments,ultraviolet and/or visible spectroscopy is used to detect each of theantibody-drug conjugate compound, the unconjugated drug compound, and,optionally, the associated linker molecule in the samples of the method.In still other embodiments, fluorescence spectroscopy is used to detecteach of the antibody-drug conjugate compound, the unconjugated drugcompound, and, optionally, the associated linker molecule in the samplesof the method.

In some embodiments, an antibody-fluorophore-conjugate (AFC) mimic isused (FIG. 4). Such a non-toxic AFC can be used to mimic chemistry andlinker species of, for example, brentuximab vedotin, and as such the“drug” components may be based on a dansyl sulfonamide ethyl amine(DSEA) moiety (FIG. 4A) attached to a maleimidocaproyl valine-citrullinelinker species (Mal-linker-DSEA) (FIG. 4B). Residual reactivemal-linker-DSEA can be quenched with N-acetyl-cysteine following theconjugation step, producing a quenched-linker-fluorophore(NAc-linker-DSEA) adduct species (FIG. 4C).

These methods provided herein are particularly useful for quantifyingthe low levels (e.g., ng/mL) of unconjugated drug compound in saidsamples.

The present methods offer several advantages over the prior art. Forexample, the present methods bypass the need to precipitate protein, andrequire substantially no sample preparation (e.g., no pre-concentration,buffer exchanges, or dilutions). Additionally, there is no carryover ofprotein or biological matrix constituents, which can compromisedetection and quantification results. The disclosed method also extendsthe linear dynamic range, which thereby increases the operatingspecification range that can be performed.

1^(st) Dimension

The 1^(st) dimension column should be able to separate or resolve theprotein or antibody from the free drug components with sufficientresolution between the two species to allow the drug to be sent to atrap or 2^(nd) dimension column while directing the protein component towaste. This is performed by exploiting the physicochemical properties ofthe ADC. An example for mixed mode is the net charge contrast of theantibody with the free drug molecules. Size-exclusion chromatography orSEC exploits the size difference between a large antibody and the smalldrug species.

In one embodiment, the 1^(st) dimension is a mixed mode anion exchanger.Therewith, net positive proteins pass through the column under acidicconditions while the net neutral to basic drugs are adsorbed to thecolumn stationary phase for later elution.

In another embodiment, the 1^(st) dimension is a mixed mode cationexchanger. Therewith, positively charged proteins are retained whileallowing drug species to pass with the injection void to be captured bya trap or 2^(nd) dimension column.

In yet another embodiment, the 1^(st) dimension is size exclusionchromatography. Therewith, large antibodies pass to waste isocraticallywith early elution times while small drug molecules elute later in thetotal inclusion peak or post total inclusion peak due to secondaryinteractions with the stationary phase.

In one embodiment, the 1^(st) dimension column is an on-line 2.1×20 mm,30 micron solid phase extraction column (Oasis® MAX available fromWaters Technologies Corporation, Milford, Mass.). Therewith, bothtrapping and first dimensional separation occur within this column.

2^(nd) Dimension Column

The 2^(nd) dimension column should be designed to minimize pressure onthe 1^(st) dimension if the 1^(st) dimension column cannot tolerate highpressure. As an example, an embodiment using an OASIS® column (availablefrom Waters Technology Corporation Milford, Mass.) as the 1^(st)dimension separation; the pressure of this 1^(st) dimension columnshould not exceed more than 6,000 PSI. Factors that effect pressure arecolumn length (shorter=lower pressure), size of particle (largerparticle=lower pressure), flow rate (low flow=lower pressure), columninner diameter (large inner diameter=lower pressure), and temperature(higher temp=lower pressure). However, a balance of these parametersfound as short, large particle, wide bore columns can result in decreasechromatographic performance. Accordingly, in one embodiment, thedisclosed methods use a superficially porous small particle 50 mmCortecs column. In some embodiments, the second dimension column is a2.1×50 mm, 2.7 micron superficially porous C18 column (Cortecs® C18available from Waters Technologies Corporation, Milford, Mass.).

If not limited by the 1^(st) dimension column, however, the 2^(nd)dimension column can be of any dimensions and stationary phase thatexhibits enough retentivity to retain the drug species afterat-column-dilution is performed and result in an acceptable separationof the drug components. Nonetheless, columns that are too retentive mayresult in carry-over of trace protein, lengthy elution times, and/orpoor chromatography of hydrophobic drug species.

Organic Modifier and Acid %

Hydrophobic active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) requireoptimization of elution strength of organic solvent. Under low acidconcentration conditions, more hydrophobic analytes may not elutecompletely or may be too broad to elute in a defined window. Higher acidconcentration conditions allows drug species to elute in an acceptablewindow.

In some embodiments, neat organic solvent or in mixed compositions withincreasing elution strength is used to elute more hydrophobic drugspecies from the 1^(st) dimension. For drug components that are toohydrophilic or elute under relatively mild organic compositions, theinitial organic composition when injected can be lowered to retain thosespecies, and a two-step gradient can be employed to capture the lesshydrophobic species with the more hydrophobic species.

In other embodiments, the acid % is modified at injection to use loweracid % at injection to retain the more hydrophilic species, thenincrease to the 2% acid composition to elute all drug components. Thismay be accomplished by using an additional solvent line(s) on thequaternary solvent manager, e.g., a pump.

Exemplary solvents that can be used in the disclosed methods include,but are not limited to, water, acetonitrile, ammonium acetate, ammoniumformate, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, propanol, tetrahydrofuran, andcombinations thereof Exemplary acids that can be used in the disclosedmethods include, but are not limited to, acetic acid, formic acid,difluoroacetic acid, and trifluoroacetic acid.

Transfer of the Drug Components

The mechanism of transferring the drug components to an analytical2^(nd) dimensions can either be performed using a trap column orat-column-dilution.

When using at-column-dilution, the goal is to dilute the strong elutingsolvent composition % to facilitate the adsorption of eluting drugcomponents onto the head of the 2^(nd) dimension column. If the organiccomposition is too high, the drugs if adsorbed could result in peaksplitting or reduced chromatographic performance, or worst casescenario, be passed through the column without being retained and resultin in-accurate assessment of drug levels. Adjusting the flow rate of the2^(nd) dimension pump allows for proper dilution. An example would be ifthe drug eluted from the 1^(st) dimension at 50% organic at a constantflow rate of 0.100 ml/min and the desired organic composition forre-adsorption in the 2^(nd) dimension column was 25% then the methodwould flow 0.100 mL/min from the 2^(nd) dimension pump to effectivelydilute the sample in a 1:1 ratio.

In some embodiments, a trap is used. Therewith, the trap should beretentive enough to retain eluting drug species and in all likelihoodat-column-dilution would still have to be used. Additionally, the trapshould have equal or lower retentivity than the 2^(nd) dimension column.If the trap were more retentive than the 2^(nd) dimension column, thenthe analyte(s) would elute off the trap in a mobile phase compositionthat does not favor adsorption to the 2^(nd) dimension column, and the2^(nd) dimension column would not add additional separation benefits.The use of the trap can help lower pressure exposure on the 1^(st)dimension column and allows the method to be performed at higher flowrates and shorter run times.

Linker and Drug Type

In one embodiment, the methods disclosed herein use an ADC mimic with afluorophore conjugate, which exhibits a lower hydrophobic characteristicthan an ADC comprising a commercial API, as demonstrated by Li et al. [JChromatogr A. 2015; 1393:81-8] For more hydrophobic drug species, theorganic percent and acid concentration may be modified in a mannersimilar to a more hydrophobic API, as discussed above. Likewise, if anincreased organic composition is required to elute the API components,the at-column-dilution and retentivity of the 2^(nd) dimension can bemodified accordingly.

The methods disclosed herein may be applied to non-cleavable linkersand/or pH labile linkers.

In one embodiment, the present methods can be used to analyze acysteine-conjugated ADCs. Alternatively, the present methods can be usedto analyze lysine conjugated ADCs. Cysteine-conjugated ADCs typicallyhave a relatively low drug load (e.g., 0-8 drugs). In contrast,lysine-conjugated ADCs typically have a higher drug load (e.g., 1-10 ormore drugs). The lysine-conjugated ADCs may exhibit a higher degree ofhydrophobicity due to (1) increased drug load and (2) the fact theinter-chain disulfide bonds are still intact. If the increasedhydrophobicity results in protein material being retained on the 1^(st)dimension and subsequently being eluted to the 2^(nd) dimension column,than it may be appropriate to cleave the conjugated drugs prior toanalysis at which point the cleaved species will generate a unique massdistinguishable from the free drug components. By cleaving the drugs thehydrophobicity of the antibody is reduced allowing it to be passedthrough the 1^(st) dimensions column as designed while retaining cleaveddrug and free-drug. If the protein is still too hydrophobic thanaddition of a reducing agent to reduce the inter-chain disulfides may beused to reduce the intact antibody into its respective sub-units.

Detection Techniques

Methods of the present technology include one or more detection ordetecting steps. For example, some embodiments utilize mass spectrometryfor detection of the antibody-drug conjugate compound and theunconjugated drug compound in the sample. In some embodiments, massspectrometry is used to establish a mass to charge ratio of each of theantibody-drug conjugate compound and the unconjugated drug compound inthe sample.In certain other embodiments, optical spectroscopy is used as thepreferred detection technique. In a particular embodiment, ultraviolet(UV) and/or visible spectroscopy is used.Mass Spectrometry

A variety of mass spectrometry systems capable of high mass accuracy,high sensitivity, and high resolution are known in the art and can beemployed in the methods of the invention. The mass analyzers of suchmass spectrometers include, but are not limited to, quadrupole (Q), timeof flight (TOF), ion trap, magnetic sector or FT-ICR or combinationsthereof. The ion source of the mass spectrometer should yield mainlysample molecular ions, or pseudo-molecular ions, and certaincharacterizable fragment ions. Examples of such ion sources includeatmospheric pressure ionization sources, e.g. electrospray ionization(ESI) and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI). ESI andMALDI are the two most commonly employed methods to ionize proteins formass spectrometric analysis. ESI and APC1 are the most commonly used ionsource techniques for LC/MS (Lee, M. “LC/MS Applications in DrugDevelopment” (2002) J. Wiley & Sons, New York).

Surface Enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization (SELDI) is an example of asurface-based ionization technique that allows for high-throughput massspectrometry (U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,208). Typically, SELDI is used toanalyze complex mixtures of proteins and other biomolecules. SELDIemploys a chemically reactive surface such as a “protein chip” tointeract with analytes, e.g., proteins, in solution. Such surfacesselectively interact with analytes and immobilize them thereon. Thus,the analytes of the invention can be partially purified on the chip andthen quickly analyzed in the mass spectrometer. By providing differentreactive moieties at different sites on a substrate surface, throughputmay be increased.

Commercially available mass spectrometers can sample and record thewhole mass spectrum simultaneously and with a frequency that allowsenough spectra to be acquired for a plurality of constituents in themixture to ensure that the mass spectrometric signal intensity or peakarea is quantitatively representative. This will also ensure that theelution times observed for all the masses would not be modified ordistorted by the mass analyzer and it would help ensure thatquantitative measurements are not compromised by the need to measureabundances of transient signals.

Optical Spectroscopy

A variety of optical spectroscopy systems capable of high accuracy, highsensitivity, and high resolution are known in the art and can beemployed in the methods of the invention. Absorption spectroscopy refersto optical spectroscopic techniques that measure the absorption ofradiation, as a function of frequency or wavelength, due to itsinteraction with a sample. The sample absorbs energy, i.e., photons,from the radiating field. The intensity of the absorption varies as afunction of frequency, and this variation is the absorption spectrum.Absorption spectroscopy is performed across the electromagneticspectrum.

Absorption spectroscopy is employed as an analytical chemistry tool todetermine the presence of a particular substance in a sample and, inmany cases, to quantify the amount of the substance present. Infraredand ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy are particularly common inanalytical applications.

There are a wide range of experimental approaches for measuringabsorption spectra. The most common arrangement is to direct a generatedbeam of radiation at a sample and detect the intensity of the radiationthat passes through it. The transmitted energy can be used to calculatethe absorption. The source, sample arrangement and detection techniquevary significantly depending on the frequency range and the purpose ofthe experiment.

The most straightforward approach to absorption spectroscopy is togenerate radiation with a source, measure a reference spectrum of thatradiation with a detector and then re-measure the sample spectrum afterplacing the material of interest in between the source and detector. Thetwo measured spectra can then be combined to determine the material'sabsorption spectrum. The sample spectrum alone is not sufficient todetermine the absorption spectrum because it will be affected by theexperimental conditions—the spectrum of the source, the absorptionspectra of other materials in between the source and detector and thewavelength dependent characteristics of the detector. The referencespectrum will be affected in the same way, though, by these experimentalconditions and therefore the combination yields the absorption spectrumof the material alone.

A wide variety of radiation sources can be employed in order to coverthe electromagnetic spectrum. For spectroscopy, it is generallydesirable for a source to cover a broad swath of wavelengths in order tomeasure a broad region of the absorption spectrum. Some sourcesinherently emit a broad spectrum. Examples of these include globars orother black body sources in the infrared, mercury lamps in the visibleand ultraviolet and x-ray tubes. One recently developed, novel source ofbroad spectrum radiation is synchrotron radiation which covers all ofthese spectral regions. Other radiation sources generate a narrowspectrum but the emission wavelength can be tuned to cover a spectralrange. Examples of these include klystrons in the microwave region andlasers across the infrared, visible and ultraviolet region (though notall lasers have tunable wavelengths).

The detector employed to measure the radiation power will also depend onthe wavelength range of interest. Most detectors are sensitive to afairly broad spectral range and the sensor selected will often dependmore on the sensitivity and noise requirements of a given measurement.Examples of detectors common in spectroscopy include heterodynereceivers in the microwave, bolometers in the millimeter-wave andinfrared, mercury cadmium telluride and other cooled semiconductordetectors in the infrared, and photodiodes and photomultiplier tubes inthe visible and ultraviolet.

UV/Visible Spectroscopy

“Ultraviolet/visible spectroscopy” refers to absorption spectroscopy orreflectance spectroscopy in the ultraviolet (UV) and/or visibleelectromagnetic spectral region. Ultraviolet (UV) electromagneticradiation can have a wavelength ranging from 100 nm (30 PHz) to 380 nm(750 THz), shorter than that of visible light but longer than X-rays.The visible light is a type of electromagnetic radiation that is visibleto the human eye. Visible electromagnetic radiation can have awavelength ranging from about 390 nm (430 THz) to about 700 nm (770THz).

The instrument used in ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is called aUV/Vis spectrophotometer. It measures the intensity of light passingthrough a sample (I), and compares it to the intensity of light beforeit passes through the sample (I_(o)). The ratio I/I_(o) is called thetransmittance, and is usually expressed as a percentage (% T). Theabsorbance, A, is based on the transmittance:

Fluorescence Spectroscopy

“Fluorescence spectroscopy” refers to a type of electromagneticspectroscopy that analyzes fluorescence from a sample. It involves usinga beam of light, usually ultraviolet light, that excites the electronsin molecules of certain compounds and causes them to emit light;typically, but not necessarily, visible light. A complementary techniqueis absorption spectroscopy. In the special case of single moleculefluorescence spectroscopy, intensity fluctuations from the emitted lightare measured from either single fluorophores, or pairs of fluorophores.

Two general types of instruments exist: (1) filter fluorometers that usefilters to isolate the incident light and fluorescent light; and (2)spectrofluorometers that use a diffraction grating monochromators toisolate the incident light and fluorescent light. Both types use thefollowing scheme: the light from an excitation source passes through afilter or monochromator, and strikes the sample. A proportion of theincident light is absorbed by the sample, and some of the molecules inthe sample fluoresce. The fluorescent light is emitted in alldirections. Some of this fluorescent light passes through a secondfilter or monochromator and reaches a detector, which is usually placedat 90° to the incident light beam to minimize the risk of transmitted orreflected incident light reaching the detector.

Various light sources may be used as excitation sources, includinglasers, LED, and lamps; xenon arcs and mercury-vapor lamps inparticular. A laser only emits light of high irradiance at a very narrowwavelength interval, typically under 0.01 nm, which makes an excitationmonochromator or filter unnecessary. A mercury vapor lamp is a linelamp, meaning it emits light near peak wavelengths. By contrast, a xenonarc has a continuous emission spectrum with nearly constant intensity inthe range from 300-800 nm and a sufficient irradiance for measurementsdown to just above 200 nm.

Filters and/or monochromators may be used in fluorimeters. Amonochromator transmits light of an adjustable wavelength with anadjustable tolerance. The most common type of monochromator utilizes adiffraction grating, that is, collimated light illuminates a grating andexits with a different angle depending on the wavelength. Themonochromator can then be adjusted to select which wavelengths totransmit. For allowing anisotropy measurements the addition of twopolarization filters are necessary: One after the excitationmonochromator or filter, and one before the emission monochromator orfilter.

As mentioned above, the fluorescence is most often measured at a 90°angle relative to the excitation light. This geometry is used instead ofplacing the sensor at the line of the excitation light at a 180° anglein order to avoid interference of the transmitted excitation light. Nomonochromator is perfect and it will transmit some stray light, that is,light with other wavelengths than the targeted. An ideal monochromatorwould only transmit light in the specified range and have a highwavelength-independent transmission. When measuring at a 90° angle, onlythe light scattered by the sample causes stray light. This results in abetter signal-to-noise ratio, and lowers the detection limit byapproximately a factor 10000, when compared to the 180° geometry.Furthermore, the fluorescence can also be measured from the front, whichis often done for turbid or opaque samples.

The detector can either be single-channeled or multichanneled. Thesingle-channeled detector can only detect the intensity of onewavelength at a time, while the multichanneled detects the intensity ofall wavelengths simultaneously, making the emission monochromator orfilter unnecessary. The different types of detectors have bothadvantages and disadvantages.

The most versatile fluorimeters with dual monochromators and acontinuous excitation light source can record both an excitationspectrum and a fluorescence spectrum. When measuring fluorescencespectra, the wavelength of the excitation light is kept constant,preferably at a wavelength of high absorption, and the emissionmonochromator scans the spectrum. For measuring excitation spectra, thewavelength passing though the emission filter or monochromator is keptconstant and the excitation monochromator is scanning. The excitationspectrum generally is identical to the absorption spectrum as thefluorescence intensity is proportional to the absorption.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The contents of all references, patents and published patentapplications cited throughout this application, as well as the Figures,are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

EXEMPLIFICATION

Having described the invention, the same will be more readily understoodthrough reference to the following Example, which is provided by way ofillustration, and are not intended to limit the invention in any way.

Example 1: A Targeted Multidimensional Method (SPE-RPLC/MS) for theAssessment of Trace Free Drug Species in Unadulterated Antibody-DrugConjugate (ADC) Samples Using Mass Spectral Detection for ImprovedSpecificity and Sensitivity

This example uses an SPE-RPLC/MS approach that is specific, sensitive,and enables method control in two dimensions. The method was evaluatedusing a clinically relevant valine-citrulline surrogate molecule basedon brentuximab vedotin. Assay sensitivity was found to be two ordersmore sensitive using MS detection in comparison to UV based detectionwith an LOQ of 0.30 ng/mL. Free-drug species were present in anunadulterated ADC surrogate sample at concentrations below 7.0 ng/mL,levels not detectable by UV alone. The 2DLC method provides a highdegree of specificity and sensitivity in the assessment of trace freedrug species with improved control over each dimension enablingstraightforward integration into existing or novel workflows.

Results:

The selection of an ADC for this example that offers the broadestapplicability of the proposed method and exhibits a pH stable linkermolecule is preferred. For ease of use and handling, an ADC thatexhibits negligible or no cytotoxicity while closely approximating thecharacteristics of commercial ADCs is equally desirable. To this end, anantibody-fluorophore-conjugate (AFC), as previously described[Wagner-Rousset, E., et al., mAbs, 2014. 6(1): p. 173-184] was used forthis study. Key aspects in the design of the AFC were that it mimicphysiochemical characteristics of the clinically relevant ADCbrentuximab vedotin (Adcetris®) [Pro, B., et al. Journal of ClinicalOnocology, 2012. 30(18): p. 2190-2196; Francisco, J. A., et al. Blood,2003. 102(4): p. 1458-1465], minimize cytotoxicity through the use of anon-cytotoxic drug mimic, and have minimal impact on the integrity ofthe original ADC. Substitution of mono-methylauristatin E (MMAE) with adansyl sulfonamide amine (DSEA, FIG. 1A) while maintaining themaleimidocaproyl valine-citrulline linker (mal-linker-DSEA, FIG. 1B),which is actively used in ADCs, successfully meets these criteria. Anin-depth study of the manufactured AFC carried out by Wagner-Rousett andcolleagues established the integrity of the ADC surrogate was notcomprised and was well suited for research and development of ADCswithout the risk of exposure to cytotoxic agents. [mAbs, 2014. 6(1): p.173-184.] As part of the conjugation process, reactive maleimidecontaining valine-citrulline linker that did not undergo conjugationwere quenched through the addition N-acetyl-cysteine (NAc-linker-DSEA,FIG. 1C) and removed via SEC purification. Assessment of residual drugspecies was carried out using a multidimensional method that couples anonline SPE mixed mode anion exchange column (Oasis® MAX, Waters) with asuperficially porous high resolution C₁₈ column (Cortecs C₁₈, Waters)with in-line detection performed simultaneously using a tunable UV(ACQUITY TUV, Waters) and single quadrupole MS detector (ACQUITY QDa,Waters).

Reference Standards

Reference standards comprised of DSEA, linker-DSEA, and NAc-linker-DSEAwere characterized using an ACQUITY H-Class Bio with 2D technology(Waters Corp.) in 1DLC configuration (see “Materials and Methods”). A 10min reversed phase (RP) gradient was performed using a superficiallyporous 2.1×50 mm, 2.7 μm C₁₈ column (Cortecs C₁₈, Waters) to assess thesuitability of the reference standards for the proposed method. Selectedion recording (SIR) of the [M+1H]⁺¹ and [M+2H]⁺² charge state werecollected for each standard. As shown in FIG. 5, a mixture of the threereference standards were base line resolved within the applied gradient(500). Interestingly, the DSEA (510) drug mimic was notably lesshydrophobic than the mal-linker-DSEA (530) and NAc-linker-DSEA (520)standards eluting at 24% organic mobile phase (MP) composition comparedto 42% and 46% MP composition for the NAc-linker-DSEA andmal-linker-DSEA standards, respectively. Relative retention times of theNAc-linker-DSEA and mal-linker-DSEA were similar to RPLC resultsobserved by Li et al [J Chromatogr A, 2015. 1393: p. 81-8] using thesame valine-citrulline linker. The free drug mimic (DSEA) was lesshydrophobic in comparison.

Reference Standard Calibration Plot

Serial dilutions of the mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEA standardswere analyzed in triplicate using a 10 min RP gradient with the sameinstrument and column configuration as FIG. 5. Data acquisition wasperformed simultaneously using a tunable UV detector set at a absorbancewavelength of 280 nm and a single quadrupole MS detector using SIRs ofthe [M+2H]⁺² charge state for each standard. Acquired data wasintegrated, plotted, and analyzed using regression analysis for the SIR(FIG. 6) and TUV chromatograms (data not shown). Assay suitability wasevaluated using regulatory guidelines [Green, J. M. AnalyticalChemistry, 1996. 68(9): p. 305A-309A] for precision (<20% R.S.D. at theLOQ, otherwise <15%) and accuracy (<20% relative error (R.E.) at theLOQ, otherwise <15%) to determine the dynamic range of the method.

An ordinary linear regression was determined to model the dataaccurately. The dynamic range (Table 1) for the single quadrupole wasdetermined to span 2.5 orders of magnitude (0.27 ng/mL-137.70 ng/mL) forthe mal-linker-DSEA standard and 2.5 orders of magnitude (0.33ng/mL-170.90 ng/mL) for the NAc-linker-DSEA standard with LOQs of 0.27ng/mL (1.35 pg on-column; SNR D 9.56) and 0.33 ng/mL (1.65 pg on-column;SNR D 9.97), respectively. The dynamic range results combined with thegood agreement of fitted data at lower concentrations (FIG. 6, inset),suggests a limit of detection of 0.10 ng/mL (0.5 pg on-column) should beachievable with the proposed assay. In practice, an undesirable level ofdata processing is required at lower concentrations for properintegration, preventing accurate analysis. Nonetheless, the ability todetect target compounds at a nominal 0.3 ng/mL (1.5 pg on-column)demonstrates the methods ability to detect drug compounds with a highdegree of sensitivity.

The linear dynamic range of the TUV measurement (Table 1) was determinedto span 2 order of magnitude formal-linker-DSEA (34.42 ng/mL-4,406.25ng/mL) and NAc-linker-DSEA (85.45 ng/mL-5,468.75 ng/mL) standard withthe LOQ determined to be 34 ng/mL (0.17 ng on-column) and 85 ng/mL (0.43ng on-column), respectively. The UV measurement was not evaluated athigher concentrations to extend the dynamic range as higherconcentrations would be outside current regulatory recommendations forallowable impurity levels. The lower sensitivity (or the higherdetection limit) of the TUV measurement was not unexpected, and supportsthe investigation to configure in-line MS detection for improvedsensitivity. Incorporation of mass detection extended the sensitivity ofthe proposed method 2 orders of magnitude beyond traditional UV-baseddetection and was 150-fold more sensitive with an LOQ of 0.30 ng/mL (1.5pg on-column) for free-drug species compared to previously publishedmethods that used a SEC-RPLC/UV configuration for a similar compound.[Li Y et al. J Chromatogr A 2015; 1393:81-8.]

TABLE 1 Assay suitability. Analyses of standards were performed intriplicate and evaluated using ICH guidelines for precision (<20% R.SDat the LOQ, otherwise <15%) and accuracy (<20% relative error (R.E.) atthe LOQ, otherwise <15%). The dynamic range was extended 2 orders ofmagnitude using the quadrupole MS detector in a serial configurationwith the LC-TUV optical detector. N = 3 TUV MS Ref. Mass R.SD R.E R.SDR.E. Sample Conc. (ng/mL) load (pg) Area (%) (%) Area (%) (%)Mal-Linker-DSEA 1 4406.25 22031.25 196.67 2.35 99.80 1195858 18.32 78.082 2208.13 11515.65 99.35 2.13 100.55 667774 11.20 87.20 3 1101.565507.80 50.05 1.80 100.74 358237 9.78 93.55 4 550.78 2753.90 25.53 1.75101.66 184526 8.42 96.37 5 275.39 1376.95 12.80 3.56 99.71 94516 7.5298.71 6 137.70 688.50 6.54 4.04 99.25 47794 6.48 99.80 7 68.85 344.253.20 2.14 88.35 24108 4.49 100.62 8 34.42 172.10 1.67 2.73 80.16 120573.17 100.53 9 17.21 86.05 6089 4.47 101.29 10 8.61 43.05 2992 4.00 99.0811 4.30 21.50 1475 2.95 96.89 12 2.15 10.75 728 6.81 93.78 13 1.08 5.40373 0.61 92.79 14 0.54 2.70 191 2.61 88.67 15 0.27 1.35 103 2.74 85.11NAc-Linker-DSEA 1 5468.75 27343.75 262.41 1.23 100.17 1081872 18.7781.76 2 2734.38 13671.90 131.17 2.07 99.31 591076 14.83 89.36 3 1367.196835.95 66.52 2.35 99.08 311053 10.56 94.05 4 683.59 3417.95 35.87 3.50103.49 161949 6.75 97.93 5 341.80 1709.00 18.59 4.21 100.90 82233 4.8199.44 6 170.90 854.50 10.56 2.06 103.42 41406 3.66 100.13 7 85.45 427.255.61 2.62 89.68 20543 2.41 99.32 8 42.72 213.60 10409 2.77 100.60 921.36 106.80 5178 2.99 99.96 10 10.68 53.40 2646 2.15 101.93 11 5.3426.70 1311 6.12 100.54 12 2.67 13.35 625 3.28 94.91 13 1.34 6.70 3224.18 95.89 14 0.67 3.35 190 2.45 109.53 15 0.33 1.65 95 5.33 102.17Solid Phase Extraction Optimization

Method development for the multidimensional approach was performedindependently for each dimension prior to coupling columns for AFCanalysis as an efficient means to perform diagnostic runs. Optimizationof an SPE method using a 2.1×20 mm, 30 μm SPE column (Oasis MAX, Waters)was performed to evaluate the elution window required to transfer themal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEA from the 1^(st) dimension (SPEcolumn) to the 2^(nd) dimension (analytical C₁₈ column). For thispurpose, the 2D LC configuration shown in FIGS. 4A-C was used with astainless steel union in lieu of the 2^(nd) dimension column with theleft and right valve set in position 2.

Table 2 shows the column manager event table. Extracted drug specieswere transferred in a 5.50 elution window using at-column-dilution withboth valves in position 2 to refocus eluting drug species at the head ofthe analytical column. The transfer was bracketed with a 0.6 secondinterval in position 2,1 to purge the fluidic path.

TABLE 2 Column manager event table for the instrument of FIGS. 4A-C.Column manager: event table Time (min) Event Action Initial Left ValvePosition 1 initial Right Valve Position 1 12.00 Left Valve Position 212.01 Right Valve Position 2 17.50 Right Valve Position 1 17.51 LeftValve Position 1

A small aliquot of the dilute trastuzumab sample used for columnconditioning was spiked with mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEAreference standards. The spiked trastuzumab sample was injected onto theSPE column with screening conditions based on RPLC results of thereference standards. The initial and eluting MP composition was adjustedin an iterative fashion until no observable ions related to thereference standards were detected between the 5 min to 12 min and 15 minto 20 min portion of the MS chromatogram. Presence of ions between 5-12min would indicate poor retention of reference standards, while ionsdetected between 15-20 min would indicate poor recovery of the referencestandards. The optimized composition was determined to be 18% and 36%organic solvent for the loading and elution conditions, respectively.

As shown in FIG. 8, using these conditions allows the protein to bepassed to waste with the retained reference standards eluting in arelatively narrow window using a minimum amount of organic MP forimproved at-column-dilution efficiency.

To verify, the stainless steel union was replaced with the 2^(nd)dimension superficially porous C₁₈ RP column and initial valve stateswere set to position 1. A fresh aliquot of the dilute trastuzumab samplewas spiked with just the NAc-linker-DSEA reference standard and injectedusing the optimized conditions as described for the AFC analysis (see“Materials and Methods”) with timed valve changes occurring as indicatedin Table 1. As shown in FIG. 9A, the protein was eluted in the void uponinitial injection allowing the spiked NAc-linker-DSEA to be successfullytransferred and re-focused onto the 2^(nd) dimension RPLC column withsubsequent elution using a 10 minute gradient (FIG. 9B).

Recovery Efficiency Evaluation

With successful transfer of the NAc-linker-DSEA reference standard usingthe proposed 2DLC configuration, a natural extension is to test therecovery efficiency of the method. Four samples of the NAc-linker-DSEAwere prepared at nominal concentrations of 2 ng/mL, 17 ng/mL, 74 ng/mL,146 ng/mL representing four points spaced throughout the dynamic rangeof the method as determined by regression analysis of the quadrupole MSdata. Injections were performed in triplicate in both 1DLC and 2DLCinstrument configurations. Peak area was compared for both instrumentconfigurations to assess recovery. Recovery was determined to be withinrecommended guidelines [Green, J. M. Analytical Chemistry, 1996. 68(9):p. 305A-309A.] as shown in Table 3, with precision (R.S.D.) below 5% forboth configurations and accuracy (R.E.) within 3%. These resultsindicate the SPE column was efficiently extracting the NAc-linker-DSEAsample from the eluent with no observable loss of standard in the void.In addition, the agreement in area between both 1D and 2D configurationsindicate transfer efficiency between columns was maintained with no lossintroduced by the stainless steel tee used for at-column-dilution. Thecombined recovery results indicate the proposed multidimensional methodto couple SPE-RPLC is sufficiently robust and fit-for-purpose withrecovery of the NAc-linker-DSEA standard demonstrated across theestablished dynamic range.

TABLE 3 2DLC recovery evaluation. Nac-linker-DSEA reference standard wasprepared at four concentrations throughout the experimentally determineddynamic range and evaluate for recovery efficiency using the 2DLCconfiguration illustrated in FIG. 7. Identical separations wereperformed in a 1DLC configuration using the same system with a union inlieu of the SPE column (1^(st) dimension) as a reference. Comparison ofpeak area across triplicate injections of the NAc-linker-DSEA referencestandard indicate sample recovery was equivalent between both 1DLC and2DLC configurations. 1DLC 2DLC Conc. R.S.D. R.S.D. (ng/mL) Area (%) R.E.(%) Area (%) R.E. (%) 2 458 5.2 95.4 482 1.7 100.4 17 4117 0.2 99.6 41461.0 100.3 74 17776 1.7 99.2 18063 2.7 100.8 146 35556 1.9 101.0 348390.2 99.0AFC Sample Analysis

AFC samples were used as received at a concentration of (1.94 mg/mL)without additional preparation and were evaluated for the presence ofmal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEA using the 2DLC configuration shownin FIG. 7. A 10 μL injection of neat AFC sample was analyzed intriplicate using the same method as before (see “Materials andMethods”). The same separation was performed using a water blank priorto each sample run to assess carry-over. As shown in FIG. 10A,triplicate SIR spectrum overlays of the blank injections show noobservable carry-over of the NAc-linker-DSEA species at 22 min andnegligible carry-over (<5% by area) of the mal-linker-DSEA specieseluting at 23 min indicating the method is reproducible and can beperformed over multiple runs for extended column use. The presence ofNAc-linker-DSEA and mal-linker-DSEA in the AFC sample was confirmed asshown in FIG. 10B with both species eluting reproducibly at 22 min and23 min, respectively. Method precision was confirmed upon closerexamination of the data as shown in Table 4, with R.S.D. determined tobe less than 3% for both the mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEA drugcomponents. Using the MS based calibration plot (FIG. 6), theconcentration of the free-drug components were determined to be 7.19ng/mL and 3.82 ng/mL for the NAc-linker-DSEA and mal-linker-DSEAcomponents, respectively. Detection of drug species at these levels, ina sample of modest concentration and injection volume, is not possiblewith optical detection alone, thus accenting the utility of an MSequipped 2DLC method such as this.

TABLE 4 AFC sample results. NAc-linker-DSEA and mal-linker-DSEA weredetected within dynamic range of the assay (FIG. 6) as recommended byICH guidelines. The concentration of NAc-linker-DSEA and mal-linker-DSEAwas determined to be 7.19 ng/mL and 3.82 ng/mL, respectively.NAc-Linker-DSEA Mal-Linker-DSEA Experimental Experimental ExperimentalExperimental Injection Area mass (pg) conc. (ng/mL) Area mass (pg) conc.(ng/mL) 1 3476 71.59 7.16 2716 38.67 3.87 2 3429 70.62 7.06 2746 39.103.91 3 3563 73.39 7.34 2599 36.98 3.70 Mean 3489 71.87 7.19 2687 38.253.82 S.D. 68 1.41 0.14 78 1.12 0.11 R.S.D. 1.95 1.96 1.96 2.89 2.92 2.92

DISCUSSION

Traditional methods for the detection, characterization, andquantification of trace free drug species have included assays based onELISA and RPLC techniques with varying success. [Stephan, J. P., K. R.Kozak, and W. L. Wong Bioanalysis, 2011. 3(6): p. 677-700; Kozak, K. R.,et al. Bioconjug Chem, 2013. 24(5): p. 772-9.] The reduction of samplepreparation steps through the incorporation of multidimensionaltechniques has afforded analysts more efficient methods for assessmentof trace drug species with improved sensitivity. Selection of orthogonalcolumn chemistries for multi-dimensional assays can be a challengingprospect as eluents and format can impact assay specificity, efficiency,and sensitivity. [Fleming, M. S., et al., Analytical Biochemistry, 2005.340(2): p. 272-278; Li, Y., et al., J Chromatogr A, 2015. 1393: p. 81-8;He, Y., et al. J Chromatogr A, 2012. 1262: p. 122-9.] The targetedremoval of APIs from biological matrices using SPE based techniques hasbeen well established in the pharmaceutical industry. To that end, SPEtechniques are becoming more prevalent in the characterization androutine testing of biopharmaceuticals. [Souverain, S., S. Rudaz, and J.L. Veuthey, Journal of Chromatography B, 2004. 801(2): p. 141-156.]Method flexibility with off-line and on-line options combined with theability to use volatile solvents makes SPE techniques ideal formultidimensional approaches with MS detection. The unique mixed modeOASIS chemistry facilitates the ability to separate complex mixturesbased on different physicochemical properties and are ideal whenconsidering the unique nature of ADCs which are comprised of hydrophilicsubstrates conjugated to hydrophobic drugs. [Wakankar, A., et al. mAbs,2011. 3(2): p. 161-172.] The current study has addressed challengesassociated with residual free drug analysis through the development of aMS compatible multidimensional approach that couples SPE-RPLCchemistries that is specific and sensitive.

Targeting free or non-conjugated hydrophobic drug species for selectiveextraction is achieved through the use of a hydrophobic SPE resininterspersed with anion exchange functional groups. Conceptually, netpositive substrates such as mAbs in solution at pH below their pI arepassed through the positively charged SPE material including mAb specieswith attached drug. In contrast, free drug and associated products areadsorbed to the mixed mode surface of the SPE ligand for downstreamanalysis. The current study successfully demonstrated this approachthrough the capture and elution of a clinically relevantvaline-citrulline based surrogate molecule and its N-acetyl-cysteinequenched product from an unadulterated ADC mimic sample using anSPE-RPLC/MS approach. Similar hydrophobic characteristics observed inthe surrogate molecules with established literature supports theviability of this method in clinical practice. [Li, Y., et al. JChromatogr A, 2015. 1393: p. 81-8.]

The success of the proposed method relies on several key aspects workingin a synergistic manner. The implementation of a SPE column as the1^(st) dimension, which is retentive towards API species, facilitates ameans for analysts to tune the specificity of the method for varyingsubstrates or drug candidates. In contrast, 1^(st) dimension separationssuch as SEC do not provide the same degree of specificity orselectivity. In addition, the mixed mode SPE column efficiently removesprotein substrates due to like charge repulsion and reduces carry-overallowing for repeated column use. As the trapped drug species are veryhydrophobic, they are eluted at an organic percent which could reducethe 2^(nd) dimension RP chromatography performance. To overcome thischallenge, at-column-dilution was incorporated to efficiently retaindrug products in the 1^(st) dimension eluent at the head of the 2^(nd)dimension column. [Hurwitz E Fau-Levy, R., et al. Cancer Research, 1975.35: p. 1175-1181; Souverain, S., S. Rudaz, and J. L. Veuthey Journal ofChromatography B, 2004. 801(2): p. 141-156.] The degree to which theeluent needs to be diluted will depend on the organic strength necessaryto elute drug products from the 1^(st) dimension, but is easily adjustedusing the proposed configuration. The improved 2^(nd) dimensionseparation efficiency afforded by the inclusion of at-column-dilution,combined with in-line MS detection, increased the sensitivity of theassay 125-fold for the mal-linker-DSEA and 250-fold for theNAc-linker-DSEA drug species with a nominal LOQ of 0.3 ng/mL whencompared to UV detection (Table 4).

The current studies MS based method represents over a 150-foldimprovement in sensitivity compared to the SEC-RPLC/UV method describedby Li et al. using similar, but not identical drug species. [Li, Y., etal. J Chromatogr A, 2015. 1393: p. 81-8.] In addition to improvedsensitivity, the ability to efficiently recover trace levels of drugspecies across a wide dynamic range makes the proposed method ideal forassessment of free drug species throughout a ADCs product life cycleincluding development, formulation, and clinical trials.

As potentially more potent drug candidates for ADCs are identified[Thorson, J. S., et al. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2000. 6(18): p.1841-1879; Clardy, J. and C. Walsh Nature, 2004. 432(7019): p. 829-837],efforts to expand the therapeutic window will require assays withimproved sensitivity for the assessment and characterization of residualfree drug species to ensure product safety and efficacy. [Wakankar, A.,et al. mAbs, 2011. 3(2): p. 161-172.] The utility of multidimensionalapproaches in the characterization of biopharmaceuticals is becomingincreasingly evident [Fleming, M. S., et al. Analytical Biochemistry,2005. 340(2): p. 272-278; Li, Y., et al. J Chromatogr A, 2015. 1393: p.81-8; He, Y., et al. J Chromatogr A, 2012. 1262: p. 122-9; Li, Y., etal. Analytical Chemistry, 2014. 86(10): p. 5150-5157; Stoll, D. R., etal. Analytical Chemistry, 2015. 87(16): p. 8307-8315; Zhang, K., et al.Journal of Separation Science, 2013. 36(18): p. 2986-2992]. In thisstudy the SPE-RPLC/MS multidimensional approach combined withat-column-dilution was demonstrated as an efficient means to bypasslengthy sample preparation steps while enabling control over eachdimension; promoting a method that can be readily adapted to existingworkflows that is specific and sensitive for free drug analysis. Futurework will include evaluation of the proposed method for extraction offree drug species using a diverse panel of clinically relevant ADCs informulation and biological matrices.

TABLE 4 Assay suitability. Analyses of standards were performed intriplicate and evaluated using ICH guidelines for precision (<20% R.S.D.at the LOQ, otherwise <15%) and accuracy (<20% relative error (R.E.) atthe LOQ, otherwise <15%). The dynamic range (gray highlight) wasextended 2 orders of magnitude using the quadrupole MS detector in aserial configuration with the LC-TUV optical detector. N = 3 TUV MS Ref.Conc. Mass R.S.D. R.E. R.S.D. R.E. Sample (ng/mL) load (pg) Area (%) (%)Area (%) (%) Mal-Linker-DSEA 1 4406.25 22031.25 196.67 2.35 99.801195858 18.32 78.08 2 2203.13 11015.65 99.35 2.13 100.55 667774 11.2087.20 3 1101.56 5507.80 50.05 1.80 100.74 358237 9.78 93.55 4 550.782753.90 25.53 1.75 101.66 184526 8.42 96.37 5 275.39 1376.95 12.80 3.5699.71 94516 7.52 98.71 6 137.70 688.50 6.64 4.04 99.25 47794 6.48 99.807 68.85 344.25 3.20 2.14 88.35 24108 4.49 100.62 8 34.42 172.10 1.672.73 80.16 12057 3.17 100.53 9 17.21 86.05 6089 4.47 101.29 10 8.6143.05 2992 4.00 99.08 11 4.30 21.50 1476 2.95 96.89 12 2.15 10.75 7286.81 93.78 13 1.08 5.40 373 0.61 92.79 14 0.54 2.70 191 2.61 88.67 150.27 1.35 103 2.74 85.11 NAc-Linker-DSEA 1 5468.75 27343.75 262.41 1.23100.17 1081872 18.77 81.78 2 2734.38 13671.90 131.17 2.07 99.31 59107614.83 89.36 3 1367.19 6835.95 66.52 2.35 99.08 311053 10.56 94.05 4683.59 3417.95 35.87 3.50 103.49 161949 6.75 97.93 5 341.80 1709.0018.59 4.21 100.90 82233 4.81 99.44 6 170.90 854.50 10.66 2.06 103.4241406 3.66 100.13 7 85.45 427.25 5.61 2.62 89.68 20543 2.41 99.32 842.72 213.60 10409 2.77 100.60 9 21.36 106.80 5178 2.99 99.96 10 10.6853.40 2646 2.15 101.93 11 5.34 26.70 1311 6.12 100.54 12 2.67 13.35 6253.28 94.91 13 1.34 6.70 322 4.18 95.89 14 0.67 3.35 190 2.45 109.53 150.33 1.65 95 5.33 102.17Material and Methods:

Chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich unlessotherwise stated. Mass spectrometry grade solvents were used for mobilephase and sample preparation.

Antibody and Linker-Payload Production and Purification

This AFC is based on the conjugation of dansyl sulfonamide ethyl amine(DSEAEA)-linker maleimide on interchain cysteines of trastuzumab used asa reference antibody. The trastuzumab used in this study is the EuropeanMedicines Agency-approved version and formulation (21 mg/mL). Thelinker-fluorophore payload was designed to mimic the linker-drug mostfrequently used in ADC clinical trials. The synthesis was brieflyreported in the supplemental material by Wagner-Rousset et al. [46] Itconsists of maleimide-caproic acid dansyl sulfonamide ethyl amine(mc_DSEA, structure FIG. 1A) with a valine-citruline linker that mimicsthe cytotoxic agent and linker conjugated to mAbs through reducedinterchain cysteine via the maleimide function.

Mild reduction of trastuzumab and coupling of DSEA-linker were performedas previously described. [Sun, M. M., et al. Bioconjug Chem, 2005.16(5): p. 1282-90.] Briefly, trastuzumab was reduced with 2.75equivalents of TCEP in 10 mM borate pH 8.4 buffer containing 150 mM NaCland 2 mM EDTA for 2 h at 37° C. The concentration of free thiols wasdeter mined by using the Ellman's reagent with L-cysteine as standard,typically resulting in around 5 thiols per antibody. To target a DAR of4, the partially reduced trastuzumab was then alkylated with 2equivalents of DSEA-linker per thiol in the same buffer for 1 h at roomtemperature. N-acetyl-cysteine (1.5 equivalents/DSEA-linker) was used toquench any unreacted DSEA-linker. The AFC was purified by size exclusionchromatography on a Superdex 200 pg column (GE Life Sciences) elutedwith 25 mM histidine pH 6.5 buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, by using anAKTA Avant biochromatography system (GE Life Sciences). The AFC (averageDAR=4.0) was characterized by most of the methods used for hinge-CysADCs (nr/rSDS-PAGE, SEC, HIC, Native MS, LC-MS (IdeS/Red) and yieldedsimilar profiles as those reported for brentuximab vedotin.[Wagner-Rousset, E., et al. mAbs, 2014. 6(1): p. 173-184; Debaene, F.,et al. Analytical Chemistry, 2014. 86(21): p. 10674-10683.] Prepared AFCsamples were used neat at a concentration of 1.94 mg/mL.

Chromatography

An ACQUITY H-Class Bio equipped with a commercially available 2Dtechnology configuration (Waters Corp.) was used for the experiments.FIG. 7A is a schematic of the instrument setup denoting column, pump,and plumbing configuration for 2DLC with at-column-dilution in place for2^(nd) dimension loading. Transfer of retained analytes on the solidphase extraction (SPE) column (1^(st) dimension) was performed throughprogrammed valve events using the column manager control interface (FIG.7B). Valve switches were staggered with a 0.01 min delay to purge theat-column-dilution fluidic path prior to and after analyte transfer. Atunable UV detector (ACQUITY TUV, Waters Corp.) equipped with a 5-mmtitanium flow cell was incorporated post 2^(nd) dimension column toevaluate the optical detection limit of the separated analytes. Singlewavelength detection was performed at an A_(max) of 280 nm with asampling rate of 20 Hz. 1DLC experiments with the appropriate column andmobile phases (MP) present in the 1^(st) dimension column position andquaternary solvent manager (QSM) reservoirs, respectively, wereperformed using the same system by physically interchanging fluidic pathconnections post column on both dimensions and leaving the 2^(nd)dimension Binary solvent manager (BSM) pump in an idle state with bothvalves in position 1.

Column Conditioning

A 2.1×20 mm, 30 μm SPE column (Oasis® MAX, Waters Corp.) was conditionedprior to sample runs using a dilute sample of trastuzumab (2 mg/mL)prepared in MS grade H₂O with 0.1% FA v/v. Column conditioning wasperformed with the chromatography system in a 1DLC configuration at aflow rate of 0.300 mL/min with the column temperature set at 30° C. QSMreservoirs were prepared as MP A: H₂O, 2% FA v/v, MP B: acetonitrile, 2%FA v/v. A 2 uL injection of the conditioning sample was separated byperforming a 10 min gradient from 0% MP B to 95% MP B until baselineline response stabilized. The 2^(nd) dimension column was conditioned ina similar fashion. A 2.1×50 mm, 2.7 μm superficially porous C₁₈ column(Cortecs C₁₈, Waters Corp.) was conditioned prior to actual sample runsusing a dilute mixture of the reference standards (0.5 ng/mL) preparedin 50:50 ACN, 0.1% FA v/v:H₂O, 0.1% FA v/v. Mobile phases were preparedas MP A: H₂O, 0.1% FA v/v, MP B: acetonitrile, 0.1% FA v/v. A 5 uLinjection of the diluted reference mixture was separated using a 10 mingradient from 5% MP B to 50% MP B at a flow rate of 0.300 ml/min and acolumn temperature of 40° C. Injections were repeated until retentiontime and detector response stabilized for individual species. The systemwas re-plumbed in a 2DLC configuration for AFC analysis afterconditioning of both columns.

Calibration Standards

Stock reference standards (FIG. 4) were dissolved in neat DMSO andprepared at concentrations of 4 μg/mL, 2.82 μg/mL, and 3.5 μg/mL forDSEA, mal-linker-DSEA, and NAc-linker-DSEA, respectively. Stocksolutions were vortexed, briefly centrifuged, and divided into 50 uLaliquots and stored in −80° C. prior to use. Individual stock referencesolutions were diluted in a 1:5 ratio using 50:50 ACN 0.1% FA v/v:H₂O0.1% FA v/v to prepare initial calibration standard solutions.Sequential 1:1 serial dilutions were performed with the initialcalibration standard solution for mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEAusing 50:50 ACN 0.1% FA v/v:H₂O 0.1% FA v/v. reference standards wereevaluated using the chromatography system in a 1DLC configuration withthe QSM reservoirs prepared as MP A: H₂O, 0.1% FA v/v, MP B:acetonitrile, 0.1% FA v/v, MP C: and D: Acetonitrile. A 5.0 uL injectionof each standard was loaded onto a 2.1×50 mm, 2.7 μm superficiallyporous C₁₈ column (Cortecs C₁₈, Waters) with the MP composition heldconstant for 1.0 min at 5% MP B at a flow rate of 0.300 ml/min and acolumn temperature of 40° C. A 10 min gradient from 5% MP B to 50% MP Bwas used to elute the reference standard. Column reconditioning wasperformed using a rapid 1.0 min gradient to increase the organiccomposition to 80% MP B followed by a 1.0 min gradient to initialconditions (5% MP B) and held constant for 2 min.

SPE Optimization

Optimization of the 2.1×20 mm, 30 μm SPE column (Oasis® MAX, WatersCorp.) was performed using a small aliquot of the dilute trastuzumabsample spiked with excess mal-linker-DSEA and NAc-linker-DSEA referencestandards to increase MS response during acquisition. The LC instrumentwas configured in the 2DLC configuration shown in FIG. 7 using two6-port, 2-position valves housed in a column manager (ACQUITY columnmanager, Waters Corp.). For optimization purposes a stainless steelunion was used in place of the 2^(nd) dimension column and both valveswere set to an initial position of 2. The 1^(st)dimension QSM reservoirswere prepared as MP A: H₂O, 2% FA v/v, MP B: acetonitrile, 2% FA v/v, MPC: and D: Acetonitrile. The 2^(nd) dimension BSM reservoirs wereprepared as MP A: H₂O, 0.1% FA v/v, MP B: acetonitrile, 0.1% FA v/v. The2^(nd) dimension BSM was programmed to flow at a rate of 0.300 mL/minwith a MP composition of 60% MP B (2^(nd) dimension MP reservoirs) toreplicate back pressure on the 1^(st) dimension column encountered whenboth columns are in-line. The spiked trastuzumab sample was injectedonto the SPE column at a flow rate of 0.100 ml/min with an initial MPcomposition of 23% MP B (1^(st) dimension MP reservoirs). The gradientwas then stepped up to 54% MP B to elute the retained referencestandards. The initial and eluting MP composition was adjusted in aniterative fashion until no observable ions related to the referencestandards were detected between the 5 min to 12 min and 15 min to 20 minportion of the MS spectrum. The optimized composition was determined tobe 18% MP B for the loading conditions and 36% MP B for the elutionconditions. Once optimized, the stainless steel union was replaces withthe 2^(nd) dimension superficially porous C18 column and initial valvestates were set to position 1. Proof-of-principle was performed using afresh aliquot of the dilute trastuzumab sample spiked with a smalleramount of the NAc-linker-DSEA reference standard and injected using theoptimized conditions described in the AFC sample analysis.

AFC Sample Analysis (1^(st) Dimension)

AFC samples were analyzed using an optimized 2-step gradient in the1^(st) dimension. QSM reservoirs were prepared as MP A: H₂O containing2% FA v/v, MP B: acetonitrile containing 2% FA v/v, MP C: and D:Acetonitrile. Neat AFC samples were injected at a volume of 10.0 uLusing isocratic conditions set at 18% MP B at a flow rate of 0.100ml/min and a column temperature of 30° C. After 9 min the MP compositionwas stepped up to 36% MP B and held constant for 8 min to elute thebound analyte. Transfer of analytes to the 2^(nd) dimension RPLC columnwas achieved through a programmed valve event where the left and rightvalves were switched to position 2 between the 12.00 and 17.50 min markof the gradient to combine the fluidic path of the 1^(st) and 2^(nd)dimension columns. A sharp 0.50 min gradient was used to increase the MPcomposition to 90% MP B from 17.0 to 17.5 min and held constant for anadditional 2.50 min. A saw tooth gradient from 90% MP B to 18% MP B wascycled 3 times to recondition the Oasis MAX SPE column with the finalcycle returning to the initial start conditions.

AFC Sample Analysis (2^(nd) Dimension)

BSM reservoirs were prepared as MP A: H₂O containing 0.1% formic acidv/v, MP B: acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid v/v. As part of the2DLC method the 2^(nd) dimension MP composition was set at 0% MP B atthe time of injection and held constant until the 17.50 min mark at aflow rate of 0.300 ml/min. At-column-dilution was performed in a 1:4dilution (0.1 mL/min 1^(st) dimension pump:0.3 mL/min 2^(nd) dimensionpump) via a stainless steel split (Vicci Valco) while the 1^(st) and2^(nd) dimension fluidic paths were combined between 12.00 and 17.50 minof the method. After 17.50 min MP composition was stepped to 25% MP Band held for 1 min. A 5.55 min gradient was performed from 25% MP B to50% MP B and held constant for an additional 0.44 min. After theseparation gradient was performed the MP composition was ramped to 90%MP B in 1 min followed by two 1 min saw tooth gradients from 90% MP B to5% MP B to recondition the RPLC column with the final cycle returning tothe initial start conditions.

Recovery Evaluation

Assessment of recovery efficiency of the SPE column was performed usingthe NAc-linker-DSEA reference standard. Four samples were prepared at aconcentrations of 1.7 ng/mL, 16.2 ng/mL, 71.9 ng/mL, and 144.6 ng/mL in50:50 ACN 0.1% FA v/v:H₂O 0.1% FA v/v to span the dynamic range based onthe NAc-linker-DSEA calibration plot (FIG. 6). Using the 2DLC systemconfiguration for the AFC sample analysis described earlier, Injectionswere performed in triplicate for four reference standard samples. Thesystem was then re-configured in a 1DLC mode, and the QSM reservoirswere changed to MP A: H₂O containing 0.1% FA v/v, MP B: acetonitrilecontaining 0.1% FA v/v, MP C: and D: Acetonitrile. The same referencesamples were directly injected onto the 2.1×50 mm, 2.7 μm superficiallyporous C₁₈ column with the MP composition held constant for 1.0 min at5% MP B at a flow rate of 0.300 ml/min and a column temperature of 40°C. A 10 min gradient from 5% MP B to 50% MP B was used to elute thereference standard. Column reconditioning was performed using a rapid1.0 min gradient to increase the organic composition to 80% MP Bfollowed by a 1.0 min gradient to initial conditions 5% MP B and heldconstant for 2 min. Recovery efficiency was determined by comparing peakarea in both 1DLC and 2DLC system configurations.

MS Settings

A single quadrupole mass spectrometer (ACQUITY QDa, Waters Corp.) wasused for MS analysis post TUV detector (FIG. 7). SIRs representing the[M+1H]⁺¹ and [M+2H]⁺² of the DSEA, mal-linker-DSEA, and NAc-linker-DSEAwere acquired in positive polarity covering a mass to charge range of 30to 1,250 m/z. A confirmed fragment of the mal-linker-DSEA (m/z 718.4)was also acquired in addition to the other charge states and used for MSoptimization. MS data was collected throughout the separation as definedin the chromatography section with the flow continuously passing throughthe MS capillary. Adjustable instrument settings were set as follows:capillary voltage 0.8 kV, sample cone 2.0 V, source temperature 400° C.Data from the MS analysis were processed within the chromatography datasystem MassLynx. Respective SIRs for the DSEA, mal-linker-DSEA, andNAc-linker-DSEA samples were summed and a mean smoothed applied with awindow size of 5 scans and 1 iteration, followed by integration.

Further embodiments of the present invention may be found as disclosedin Birdsall et al. mAbs, 2016. 8(2): 305-317, incorporated herein byreference.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

-   1. Strebhardt, K. and A. Ullrich, Paul Ehrlich's magic bullet    concept: 100 years of progress. Nat Rev Cancer, 2008. 8(6): p.    473-480.-   2. Wu, A. M. and P. D. Senter, Arming antibodies: prospects and    challenges for immunoconjugates. Nat Biotech, 2005. 23(9): p.    1137-1146.-   3. Reichert, J. M., et al., Monoclonal antibody successes in the    clinic. Nat Biotech, 2005. 23(9): p. 1073-1078.-   4. Doronina, S. O., et al., Development of potent monoclonal    antibody auristatin conjugates for cancer therapy. Nat    Biotech, 2003. 21(7): p. 778-784.-   5. Remillard, S., et al., Antimitotic activity of the potent tumor    inhibitor maytansine. Science, 1975. 189(4207): p. 1002-1005.-   6. Junutula, J. R., et al., Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic    drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat    Biotech, 2008. 26(8): p. 925-932.-   7. McDonagh, C. F., et al., Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with    defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment. Protein Eng    Des Sel, 2006. 19(7): p. 299-307.-   8. Hofer, T., et al., Molecularly Defined Antibody Conjugation    through a Selenocysteine Interface. Biochemistry, 2009. 48(50): p.    12047-12057.-   9. Axup, J. Y., et al., Synthesis of site-specific antibody-drug    conjugates using unnatural amino acids. Proceedings of the National    Academy of Sciences, 2012. 109(40): p. 16101-16106.-   10. Sun, M. M., et al., Reduction-alkylation strategies for the    modification of specific monoclonal antibody disulfides. Bioconjug    Chem, 2005. 16(5): p. 1282-90.-   11. Pro, B., et al., Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in Patients With    Relapsed or Refractory Systemic Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma:    Results of a Phase II Study. Journal of Clinical Onocology, 2012.    30(18): p. 2190-2196.-   12. Lewis Phillips, G. D., et al., Targeting HER2-positive breast    cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate.    Cancer Res, 2008. 68(22): p. 9280-90.-   13. Chari, R. V., Targeted cancer therapy: conferring specificity to    cytotoxic drugs. Acc Chem Res, 2008. 41(1): p. 98-107.-   14. Dosio, F., P. Brusa, and L. Cattel, Immunotoxins and Anticancer    Drug Conjugate Assemblies: The Role of the Linkage between    Components. Toxins, 2011. 3(7): p. 848-883.-   15. Sanderson, R. J., et al., In vivo drug-linker stability of an    anti-CD30 dipeptide-linked auristatin immunoconjugate. Clin Cancer    Res, 2005. 11(2 Pt 1): p. 843-52.-   16. Shen, B.-Q., et al., Conjugation site modulates the in vivo    stability and therapeutic activity of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat    Biotech, 2012. 30(2): p. 184-189.-   17. Kovtun, Y. V., et al., Antibody-Drug Conjugates Designed to    Eradicate Tumors with Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Expression of    the Target Antigen. Cancer Research, 2006. 66(6): p. 3214-3221.-   18. Stephan, J. P., K. R. Kozak, and W. L. Wong, Challenges in    developing bioanalytical assays for characterization of    antibody-drug conjugates. Bioanalysis, 2011. 3(6): p. 677-700.-   19. Li, Y., et al., Limiting degradation of reactive antibody drug    conjugate intermediates in HPLC method development. Journal of    Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2014. 92: p. 114-118.-   20. Hudecz, F., et al., The influence of synthetic conditions on the    stability of methotrexate-monoclonal antibody conjugates determined    by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography. Biomedical    Chromatography, 1992. 6(3): p. 128-132.-   21. Hurwitz E Fau-Levy, R., et al., The covalent binding of    daunomycin and adriamycin to antibodies, with retention of both drug    and antibody activities. Cancer Research, 1975. 35: p. 1175-1181.-   22. Souverain, S., S. Rudaz, and J. L. Veuthey, Restricted access    materials and large particle supports for on-line sample    preparation: an attractive approach for biological fluids analysis.    Journal of Chromatography B, 2004. 801(2): p. 141-156.-   23. Chari, R. V., et al., Enhancement of the selectivity and    antitumor efficacy of a CC-1065 analogue through immunoconjugate    formation. Cancer Res, 1995. 55(18): p. 4079-84.-   24. Greenfield, R. S., et al., Evaluation in vitro of adriamycin    immunoconjugates synthesized using an acid-sensitive hydrazone    linker. Cancer Res, 1990. 50(20): p. 6600-7.-   25. Kozak, K. R., et al., Total antibody quantification for    MMAE-conjugated antibody-drug conjugates: impact of assay format and    reagents. Bioconjug Chem, 2013. 24(5): p. 772-9.-   26. Liu, M., et al., HPLC method development, validation and    impurity characterization for an antitumor Hsp90 inhibitor-PU-H71    (NSC 750424). J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2014. 89: p. 34-41.-   27. Cohen, S. A., et al., Multiple peak formation in reversed-phase    liquid chromatography of papain. Analytical Chemistry, 1984.    56(2): p. 217-221.-   28. Burton, W. G., et al., Separation of proteins by reversed-phase    high-performance liquid chromatography: I. Optimizing the column.    Journal of Chromatography A, 1988. 443: p. 363-379.-   29. Lee, H. M., et al., Microbore high-performance liquid    chromatographic determination of cisapride in rat serum samples    using column switching. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl, 1999.    727(1-2): p. 213-7.-   30. Vega-Morales, T., Z. Sosa-Ferrera, and J. J. Santana-Rodriguez,    Development and optimisation of an on-line solid phase extraction    coupled to ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass    spectrometry methodology for the simultaneous determination of    endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewater samples. J Chromatogr    A, 2012. 1230: p. 66-76.-   31. Jeong, C. K., et al., Narrowbore high-performance liquid    chromatography for the simultaneous determination of sildenafil and    its metabolite UK-103,320 in human plasma using column switching. J    Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl, 2001. 752(1): p. 141-7.-   32. Thorson, J. S., et al., Understanding and Exploiting Nature's    Chemical Arsenal: The Past, Present and Future of Calicheamicin    Research. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2000. 6(18): p. 1841-1879.-   33. Clardy, J. and C. Walsh, Lessons from natural molecules.    Nature, 2004. 432(7019): p. 829-837.-   34. Fleming, M. S., et al., A reversed-phase high-performance liquid    chromatography method for analysis of monoclonal    antibody-maytansinoid immunoconjugates. Analytical    Biochemistry, 2005. 340(2): p. 272-278.-   35. Li, Y., et al., A size exclusion-reversed phase two    dimensional-liquid chromatography methodology for stability and    small molecule related species in antibody drug conjugates. J    Chromatogr A, 2015. 1393: p. 81-8.-   36. He, Y., et al., On-line coupling of size exclusion    chromatography with mixed-mode liquid chromatography for    comprehensive profiling of biopharmaceutical drug product. J    Chromatogr A, 2012. 1262: p. 122-9.-   37. Li, Y., et al., Characterization and Stability Study of    Polysorbate 20 in Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Formulation by    Multidimensional Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Charged    Aerosol Detection-Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 2014.    86(10): p. 5150-5157.-   38. Stoll, D. R., et al., Direct Identification of Rituximab Main    Isoforms and Subunit Analysis by Online Selective Comprehensive    Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Analytical    Chemistry, 2015. 87(16): p. 8307-8315.-   39. Zhang, K., et al., Analysis of pharmaceutical impurities using    multi-heartcutting 2D LC coupled with UV-charged aerosol MS    detection. Journal of Separation Science, 2013. 36(18): p.    2986-2992.-   40. Birdsall, R. E., et al., A rapid on-line method for mass    spectrometric confirmation of a cysteine-conjugated    antibody-drug-conjugate structure using multidimensional    chromatography. mAbs, 2015: p. 00-00.-   41. Lazar, A. C., et al., Analysis of the composition of    immunoconjugates using size-exclusion chromatography coupled to mass    spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 2005. 19(13): p. 1806-14.-   42. Valliere-Douglass, J., A. Wallace, and A. Balland, Separation of    populations of antibody variants by fine tuning of    hydrophobic-interaction chromatography operating conditions. Journal    of Chromatography A, 2008. 1214(1-2): p. 81-89.-   43. Valliere-Douglass, J. F., S. M. Hengel, and L. Y. Pan,    Approaches to Interchain Cysteine-Linked ADC Characterization by    Mass Spectrometry. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2014.-   44. Valliere-Douglass, J. F., W. A. McFee, and O. Salas-Solano,    Native Intact Mass Determination of Antibodies Conjugated with    Monomethyl Auristatin E and F at Interchain Cysteine Residues.    Analytical Chemistry, 2012. 84(6): p. 2843-2849.-   45. Chen, J., et al., Development of a native nanoelectrospray mass    spectrometry method for determination of the drug-to-antibody ratio    of antibody-drug conjugates. Anal Chem, 2013. 85(3): p. 1699-704.-   46. Wagner-Rousset, E., et al., Antibody-drug conjugate model fast    characterization by LC-MS following IdeS. mAbs, 2014. 6(1): p.    173-184.-   47. Debaene, F., et al., Innovative Native MS Methodologies for    Antibody Drug Conjugate Characterization: High Resolution Native MS    and IM-MS for Average DAR and DAR Distribution Assessment.    Analytical Chemistry, 2014. 86(21): p. 10674-10683.-   48. Huang, R. C., et al., Utility of Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry    for Drug-to-Antibody Ratio Measurements in Antibody-Drug Conjugates.    Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2015: p. 1-4.-   49. Janin-Bussat, M. C., et al., Characterization of antibody drug    conjugate positional isomers at cysteine residues by peptide mapping    LC-MS analysis. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2014.    981-982: p. 9-13.-   50. Pascoe, R., J. P. Foley, and A. I. Gusev, Reduction in    matrix-related signal suppression effects in electrospray ionization    mass spectrometry using on-line two-dimensional liquid    chromatography. Anal Chem, 2001. 73(24): p. 6014-23.-   51. King, R., et al., Mechanistic investigation of ionization    suppression in electrospray ionization. Journal of the American    Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2000. 11(11): p. 942-950.-   52. Stoll, D. R., X. Wang, and P. W. Carr, Comparison of the    practical resolving power of one- and two-dimensional    high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of metabolomic    samples. Anal Chem, 2008. 80(1): p. 268-78.-   53. Francisco, J. A., et al., cAC10-vcMMAE, an anti-CD30-monomethyl    auristatin E conjugate with potent and selective antitumor activity.    Blood, 2003. 102(4): p. 1458-1465.-   54. Green, J. M., Peer Reviewed: A Practical Guide to Analytical    Method Validation. Analytical Chemistry, 1996. 68(9): p. 305A-309A.-   55. Singtoroj, T., et al., A new approach to evaluate regression    models during validation of bioanalytical assays. J Pharm Biomed    Anal, 2006. 41(1): p. 219-27.-   56. Wakankar, A., et al., Analytical methods for physicochemical    characterization of antibody drug conjugates. mAbs, 2011. 3(2): p.    161-172.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for analyzing antibody-drug conjugatecompounds, said method comprising: (i) providing a sample comprising anantibody-drug conjugate compound and an unconjugated drug compound; (ii)exposing the sample to a solid phase extraction column comprising amixed mode stationary phase; (iii) diluting an eluting solvent from thesolid phase extraction column; (iv) exposing the sample to a reversephase chromatography column comprising hydrophobic stationary phase; (v)separating the antibody-drug conjugate compound and the unconjugateddrug compound in the sample; (vi) detecting each of the antibody-drugconjugate compound and the unconjugated drug compound in the sampleusing mass spectrometry; and (vii) quantifying an amount of unconjugateddrug compound in the sample.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein massspectrometry is used to establish a mass to charge ratio of each of theantibody-drug conjugate compound and the unconjugated drug compound inthe sample.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method furthercomprises the step of trapping the unconjugated drug compound.
 4. Themethod of claim 3, wherein the trapping step is performed prior toexposing the sample to the solid phase extraction column.
 5. The methodof claim 3, wherein the trapping step is performed between exposing thesample to the solid phase extraction column and the reverse phasechromatography column.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising astep of adjusting acid concentration to retain the unconjugated drugcompound in either the solid phase extraction column or the reversephase chromatography column.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the mixedmode stationary phase comprises a hydrophobic solid phase extractionresin interspersed with anion exchange functional groups.